Compare the suitability of Greenfield and Brownfield sites for housing development

A) Comp are the suitability of Greenfield and Brownfield sites for housing k outright takegeIf recent homes were build, then some would be in untaught regions and some in the cities. There are major(ip) arguments oer the proportion of the brand-new ho customh seniors that should be in cities, verdant areas, villages and towns. This has become the debate new(prenominal) whether new homes should be on Greenfield or Brownfield ground, which are vague terms.Brownfield primer is sometimes social functiond to refer to drink down in urban areas. A more cut definition is take down urban areas that catch been previously giveed often for industry, offices and housing. whatsoever Brownfield sites go forth prepare been cleared of obsolescent building, others will not. Brownfield get can be found in both major cities and small towns.Greenfield land is land that has neer been developed and includes wasteland that no oneness ever insufficiencyed to build on, protected area s such as the green belt, and parks, golf game courses and playing fields. There is both clownish Greenfield land and urban Greenfield land. It is not the uniform as greenbelt land.The level arrange by the Government is for 60% of new ho use of goods and servicess to be on Brownfield land. Countryside and environmental organisations direct argued the figure should be nearer 75%. The Urban Task Force, established in 1998 by the judicature argued that the 60% target would not be met for 3 reasons in that location is a mismatch between where land is available (northern England) and where pressure for housing is the superior (south east England) too much Greenfield land is already al graded for housing the supply for Brownfield land is quite limited, sometimes in unenviable locations and often as heights maturation costs due to clearing old buildings and contamination.Those who support a high proportion of new houses on urban Brownfield sites postulate that it has economic, social and environmental benefits. Urban residents will be near to work and waste activities will be able to use public transport, this would mean less car-related aptitude use and pollution. Brownfield development would protect rural lifestyles and the countryside and increase in car use would be averted. Arguments for building on rural Greenfield sites claim that land is usually cheaper to develop in rural areas be do it has not been built on in advance. There is still multitude of rural land. In 1991, only 10.6% of land in England was in urban use and if development patterns continued as they ease up done then this figure would raising to only 11.9% by 2016.Much unpolished land is doing nothing. In 1995, 545,000 hectares of terra firma land (5.8% of the total) were set aside and receiving European juncture subsidy. Also umteen farmers are experiencing difficulties, 60,000 farming jobs have been lost in the stand firm decade. People want to live in environmentally pleas ant rural areas because they have less pollution, crime and noise. This includes many of the new households that will be single soul households, such as divorced mess with children and widowers, many of whom will not want to live in densely live cities.B) What are the consequences of re- urbanization in Brighton and Hove and to what extent has this resulted in gentrification.Examples of gentrification have been shown in the consequences of Brighton and Hoves re urbanisation. Gentrification is the summons where by sustained buildings in an intimate area of a city are bought and improved to become homes for the middle secernate and wealthy. This has occurred in a number of areas in Brighton and Hove. An example of the restoration of Brighton and Hove is shown at metropolis College in capital of Virginia Terrace, where the windows have been designed with stained glass. Previous windows had suffered deterioration through want of maintenance and investment since the 1960s.The mai n cause of this deterioration was due to the fact that the Richmond Terrace site had very short(p) money to pay for repairs and maintenance for the windows as not many students were taking up the science and engineering courses the site had to offer. This was mainly due to the fact that there was a reduction in apprenticeship schemes. This eventually led to the abandonment of the site. Amenities and other additions do the redevelopment of the site a dearly-won process. However, this was helped by private investments. One and two bedroom apartments have been created within the college and the prices for these starts at around 200,000.Since the re urbanisation of Brighton and Hove, many sites, like Richmond Terrace, have been appreciate as having potential for gentrification. The modernisation of houses in Pelham Square within the North Laine area is another example. These run-down terrace houses straightway bear the wealthy. Private homeowners have gentrified them with no dir ect intervention from the Council. Gentrification in addition occurred subsequently the Argus offices re-located out of this zone to an industrial estate. The building was left empty before a major fire in the winter of 1999/2000 this led to it becoming derelict. However, this has now led to it becoming an area of high status designer homes.Although to a mammoth extent Brighton and Hoves re urbanisation has resulted in gentrification, there have been other consequences. The renovation of the North Laine area has been sensitive to persist in its character, an example of which is the improvement made to the Sydney Street. The set street has been made a one-way thoroughfare so less calling passes through. It also has a widened pavement to accommodate for pedestrians and has been repaved. There are also sections of brocaded road to slow cars, and bollards have been erected to dissuade parking on the pavements thereby fashioning the street more pleasant.Brighton and Hove has rece ived whizz Regeneration Budget funding from the government for urban improvement because the council has proved to be effective in this area, this funding is also there because the area has been recognized as having a relatively high relative incidence of social problems and unemployment. To gain this funding, the council must locate matched investment, thus contributing to Brighton and Hoves re urbanisation and revitalisation as the place to be.